Perioperative Risk Assessment for Surgery of Consecutive Cases with Ventricular Septal Rupture: Seeking A Novel and Comprehensive Method.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but lethal complication occurring after acute myocardial infarction. The aim of our study was to review the single-center experience of surgery for VSR and seek a comprehensive evaluation process for early mortality. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgical repair for postinfarction VSR in our institution retrospectively were evaluated from Jan. 2006 to Dec. 2019. The endpoint of the study was mortality within 30 days after VSR surgery, which was divided into survivors and nonsurvivors. The calibration and discrimination of two risk evaluation systems (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score) in total were compared by Hosmer-Lemeshow, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Risk factors in subsets were assessed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients undergoing surgery for VSR repair were reviewed, and the early mortality after surgery was 34.8% (N = 8). The expected mortality predicted by EuroSCORE II was 24.3%, and that of the STS score was 12.2%. Both the EuroSCORE II and STS risk evaluation systems showed positive calibration in predicting mortality (H-L: P = 0.117 and P = 0.346, respectively) but poor discriminative power (AUC=0.633 and 0.575). Significant predictors determined by univariate analysis were concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (P = 0.035) and postoperative continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Early mortality of VSR after surgery remains high, and the evaluation process is complicated. The performances of the two risk evaluation systems were not optimal, but EuroSCORE II was more accurate than STS. Patients with lower preoperation EuroSCORE II, concomitant CABG during repair, and no need for CRRT after surgery may have a better early survival rate.

Surgical Repair of Postinfarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but life-threatening complication after acute myocardial infarction. Although surgical correction is challenging and associated with high mortality, it remains the treatment of choice. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the early outcome of surgical VSR repair. METHODS: We searched electronic databases from January 1998 to February 2020. Studies reporting patients undergoing surgical treatment for VSR were analyzed. The primary outcome assessed was operative mortality. Differences were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the relationships of predefined surgical variables and clinical prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 6361 adult patients from 41 studies were identified. Operative mortality was 38.2%. Pooled ORs showed increased odds of operative mortality in patients with preoperative or perioperative intraaortic balloon pump insertion (OR = 3.48; 95% CI, 3.01-4.02; P < .001), right ventricular dysfunction (OR = 2.85; 95% CI, 1.47-5.52; P = .002), posterior VSR (OR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.30-2.31; P < .001), and emergency surgery (OR = 3.79; 95% CI, 2.52-5.72; P < .001). Temporal trend evaluation revealed no difference over time in the operative mortality rate; it was 34% in both time-related groups (1971-2000 versus 2001-2018). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular septal rupture repair has a high operative mortality. Patients with preoperative or perioperative intraaortic balloon pump support, right ventricular dysfunction at presentation, or posterior defects, and those undergoing emergent VSR correction have increased odds of operative mortality.

Mortality and predictors of survival in patients with recent ventricular septal rupture.

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but fatal complication after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the mortality in patients with recent VSR and appropriate timing of surgical repair have not been clarified. To examine the background characteristics and mortality of VSR patients as well as the usefulness and appropriate timing of surgery in this patient cohort. Among 3,947 consecutive patients with AMI at our hospital, 39 patients diagnosed with VSR from 2002 to 2020 were included in the analysis. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography to confirm VSR on admission. Coronary angiography (CAG) and measurement of pulmonary-systemic flow ratio were performed before emergent surgery. The use of mechanical support devices before or after procedures was considered for all patients who underwent CAG. Basically, we performed emergent or urgent operations to patients who were in a shock state or who needed mechanical support. The final decision of the timing of the operation was made by the cardiac team. Patients' mean age was 76.3 years, and 33.3% of them were males. Most culprit lesions were located in the left anterior ascending artery (81.3%). The mean pulmonary-systemic flow ratio after VSR onset was 3.07 ± 1.98. On admission, 48.7% of patients were in a shock state. Surgical repair was possible in 28 patients at a median of 1 day after admission, with a mortality rate of 25%. Among all patients, the mortality rate was 43.6%. Survivors were significantly younger (71.3 ± 11.3 vs. 82.7 ± 6.2 years, p < 0.01), had higher mean arterial blood pressure (75.6 ± 14.4 vs. 62.8 ± 16.2 mmHg, p = 0.0496) and lower ejection fraction (44.3 ± 11.7% vs. 54.8 ± 7.9%, p = 0.04), and underwent surgical repair more frequently (95.5% vs. 41.2%, p < 0.01) than the non-survivors. In multivariate analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.18 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.38, p = 0.04) and surgical repair (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00-0.73, p = 0.03) were significant predictors of survival. In surgical repair cases, time from admission to operation did not differ significantly between survivors and non-survivors. Surgical repair and younger age are predictors of survival in patients with recent VSR, but the timing of surgery was not.

Transcatheter treatment of postinfarct ventricular septal defects.

Postinfarct ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are a mechanical complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with a very poor prognosis. They are estimated to occur in 0.2% of patients presenting with AMI, with 1-month survival of 6% without intervention. Guidelines recommend surgical repair, but recent advances in transcatheter technology, and bespoke device development, mean it is increasingly viable as a closure option. Surgical mortality is between 30% and 50% for all-comers, while in series of transcatheter closure, mortality was 32%. Transcatheter closure appears durable, with no evidence of late leaks and low long-term mortality in series with up to 5-year follow-up. Guidelines recommend early closure, which is likely to provide most benefit for patients regardless of the closure method. Multimodality cardiac imaging including echocardiography, CT and cardiac MRI can define size, shape, location of defects and their relationship to other cardiac structures, assisting with treatment decisions. Brief delay to allow stabilisation of the patient is appropriate, but untreated patients risk rapid deterioration. Mechanical circulatory support may be helpful, although the preferred modality is unclear. Transcatheter closure involves large bore venous access and the formation of an arteriovenous loop (under fluoroscopic and trans-oesophageal echocardiographic guidance) in order to facilitate deployment of the device in the defect and close the postinfarct VSD. Guidelines suggest transcatheter closure as an alternative to surgical repair in centres where appropriate expertise exists, but decisions for all patients with postinfarct VSD should be led by the multidisciplinary heart team.

[Analysis of mortality relative factors in patients with ventricular septal rupture complicating myocardial infarction].

Objective: To examine the mortality rate and relative factors associate with ventricular septal rupture in myocardial infarction patients. Methods: A total of 51 patients who suffered from myocardial infarction complicating with ventricular septal rupture received operative procedures between January 2005 and December 2018 in Department of Cardiac Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 34 males and 17 females, with an age of (63±8) years (range: 44 to 82 years). The time between ventricular septal rupture and surgical procedure was (44±39) days (range: 3 to 187 days). The t test and χ(2) test were used for univariate analysis, Logistics regression model was used for multivariate analysis of in-hospital mortality relative factors. Results: There were 8 patients dead in hospital, 43 patients survived, the overall mortality rate was 15.7% in hospital. The post-operation mortality rate was 2/3 of who suffered ventricular septal rupture and underwent operation within 1 week, but it's markedly decreased to 6.5% if the time over 4 weeks. Univariate analysis showed that renal failure before operation, creatinine before operation, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac function (New York Heart Association) grade Ⅳ, severe tricuspid regurgitation, dialysis post-operation, creatinine of the first day of post-operation, the time between and operation more than 4 weeks were in-hospital mortality relative factors. Multivariate analysis reflected that advanced age (OR=1.32, 95%CI: 1.05 to 1.75, P=0.033), cardiac function grade Ⅳ (OR=2.25, 95%CI: 1.62 to 2.82, P=0.003), severe tricuspid regurgitation (OR= 1.82, 95%CI: 1.31 to 2.43, P=0.001), renal failure before operation (OR=1.78, 95%CI: 1.26 to 2.32, P=0.015), the time between ventricular septal rupture and operation less than 1 week (OR=2.50, 95%CI: 1.52 to 2.98, P=0.012), were independent in-hospital mortality relative factors. Conclusions: The surgery operation is an effective way to deal with ventricular septal rupture combined with myocardial infarction. The independent relative factors of in-hospital mortality are advanced age, cardiac function grade Ⅳ, renal failure before operation, severe tricuspid regurgitation, the time between ventricular septal rupture and operation less than 1 week.

Early thrombolysis is associated with decreased operative mortality in postinfarction ventricular septal rupture.

BACKGROUND: Post myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture (PMI-VSR) is a dreaded mechanical complication of acute coronary syndromes. Given that surgical mortality approaches 50%, it is pragmatic that the risk factors for mortality and outcomes after surgical correction of PMI- VSR are carefully scrutinized. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of 35 patients presenting for surgical closure of post myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture over six years. We reviewed patient characteristics, clinical, echocardiographic, angiographic and perioperative risk factors which may affect mortality after surgical repair of PMIVSR and 30 day and one year mortality rates of these patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic and cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify predictors of operative and overall mortality. Long term survival was presented with Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (46%) were in cardiogenic shock. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was done in 22 patients (63%) but did not influence survival. Preoperative thrombolysis was done in 12 patients (34%) out of which 10 (53%) survived Operative mortality was 46% and one-year mortality was 49%. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative thrombolysis: Hazards ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.61; p value of 0.01, as significant independent predictor of survival in PMIVSR cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative thrombolysis is associated with decreased odds of operative and overall mortality after surgical repair in PMIVSR patients.

Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Defect　- Findings From a Japanese National Database.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) after myocardial infarction (MI) is a rare but fatal complication. We report patients' characteristics and operative outcomes after surgical repair of post-MI VSD using a national database of Japan.Methods and Results:This was a retrospective review of the Japan Adult Cardiovascular Surgery Database (JCVSD) to identify adults (age ≥18 years) who underwent surgical repair of post-MI VSD between 2008 and 2014. The primary outcome was operative death. We identified 1,397 patients (671 male [48%], 74.1±9.3 years old) undergoing surgical repair of post-MI VSD among 288,736 patients undergoing cardiac surgery enrolled in the JCVSD during the same period. Of these, 1,075 (77.0%) were supported preoperatively with an intra-aortic balloon pump. Surgical status was urgent in 391 (28.0%) and emergency/salvage in 731 (52.3%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 475 (34.0%). Overall 30-day and operative mortalities were 24.3% and 33.0%, respectively. Operative mortality varied according to surgical status: 15.6% in elective, 30.9% in urgent, and 40.6% in emergency/salvage cases. Multivariable analysis identified advanced age and emergency/salvage status as being strongly associated with increased odds of operative death. CONCLUSIONS: Post-MI VSD remains a devastating complication in Japan as well as in the USA and Europe.

Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Mechanical Complications in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the temporal trends and outcomes of mechanical complications after myocardial infarction in the contemporary era. BACKGROUND: Data regarding temporal trends and outcomes of mechanical complications after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) are limited in the contemporary era. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample database (2003 to September 2015) was queried to identify all STEMI and NSTEMI hospitalizations. Temporal trends and outcomes of mechanical complications after STEMI and NSTEMI, including papillary muscle rupture, ventricular septal defect, and free wall rupture, were described. RESULTS: The analysis included 3,951,861 STEMI and 5,114,270 NSTEMI hospitalizations. Mechanical complications occurred in 10,726 of STEMI hospitalizations (0.27%) and 3,041 of NSTEMI hospitalizations (0.06%), with no changes in trends (p = 0.13 and p = 0.83, respectively). The rates of in-hospital mortality in patients with mechanical complications were 42.4% after STEMI and 18.0% after NSTEMI, with no significant trend changes (p = 0.62 and p = 0.12, respectively). After multivariate adjustment, patients who had mechanical complications after myocardial infarction had higher in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, hemodialysis, and respiratory complications compared with those without mechanical complications. Predictors of lower mortality in patients with mechanical complications who developed cardiogenic shock included surgical repair in the STEMI and NSTEMI cohorts and percutaneous coronary intervention in the STEMI cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary data from a large national database show that the rates of mechanical complications are low in patients presenting with STEMI and NSTEMI. Post-myocardial infarction mechanical complications continue to be associated with high mortality rates, which did not improve during the study period.

Profile and Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Rupture in Patients With Shock.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of surgical treatment of ventricular septal rupture (VSR) complicating acute myocardial infarction are worse in patients with cardiogenic shock. This study aimed to identify clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with VSR presenting with cardiogenic shock. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in 105 consecutive VSR patients, 71 with cardiogenic shock (67.6%) and 34 without cardiogenic shock (32.4%), who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Adult Cardiac Surgery of Fuwai Hospital between January 2002 and December 2017. Baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients with VSR with and without cardiogenic shock were assessed. RESULTS: There were no differences in hypertension, diabetes, history of myocardial infarction, body mass index, or location of VSR between patients with and without cardiogenic shock. The size of VSR was larger in patients with cardiogenic shock than in those without (18.2 ± 8.1 mm vs 14.0 ± 7.8 mm; P = .013). Intraaortic balloon pump was required more in patients with cardiogenic shock before operation (39 [68.4%] vs 1 [5.0%]; P < .001]. More emergency surgeries were performed in the cardiogenic shock group (21 [29.6%] vs 3 [8.8%]; P = .018). There were 3 in-hospital deaths among patients with VSR with cardiogenic shock. After 76.56 ± 47.78 months of follow-up, only 2 noncardiac deaths were documented. CONCLUSIONS: The larger the ventricular septal rupture is, the more prone patients are to develop cardiogenic shock. Surgical treatment outcomes for VSR with cardiogenic shock are satisfactory.

Comparison in Prevalence, Predictors, and Clinical Outcome of VSR Versus FWR after Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Prospective, Multicenter Registry MOODY Trial-Heart Rupture Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Differences in the predictors between ventricular septal rupture (VSR) and free wall rupture (FWR) have not been fully studied. Data on the prevalence and clinical outcome of heart rupture are limited. HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to investigate heart rupture incidence and clinical results in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Of 9265 AMI patients in the MOODY registry between March 1999 and October 2016, a total of 146 were studied. The primary clinical endpoint was rupture prevalence and in-hospital mortality. Independent factors of heart rupture were analyzed using Cox proportional model and were compared between patients with VSR and those with FWR. RESULTS: Of 9265 AMI patients, 146 (1.58%) patients had a heart rupture (FWR, 94 (1.02%)) and VSR (52 (0.56%)). All patients with FWR died during hospitalization, and in-hospital mortality was recorded in 37 (71.2%) patients with VSR, who had an extremely longer time delay from AMI onset to the first medical contact (FMC) (~20 h). FWR usually occurred in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with a FMC ≥ 3 h, for whom primary reperfusion was not performed. Percutaneous repair at 1-2 weeks following AMI was associated with less mortality, and 9 of 38 patients who underwent non-primary reperfusion died post procedure. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the importance of shortening FMC to prevent VSR and of early primary reperfusion in STEMI patients to reduce FWR. Urgent closure of rupture is necessary to reduce in-hospital and 1-year mortality. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.clinicaltrials.org, identifier: No. NCT03051048.

Outcome of Surgical Repair of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: A Single Center Observational Study.

To review the experience of surgical repair of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) and analyze the associated outcomes in National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute (NHFH & RI). This retrospective review was performed on 19 consecutive cases who had undergone surgical repair of post-infarction VSR between 2009 and 2017. Continuous variables were summarized as mean plus/minus the standard deviation or median. Categorical variables were expressed as percentage of the sample. Comparison between in-hospital survivors versus non-survivors was performed by Student's t-test and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for continuous and categorical variables respectively. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Mean age of survivor and non-survivors were 53.53±9.2 and 56.33±1.5 years consecutively. Anterior VSR 14(73.6%) was more common than posterior VSR 5(26.4%). All patients had significant coronary lesions; the frequency of 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel disease was 22.2%, 27.7% and 50.0% consecutively. The left anterior descending coronary artery was the infarct-related artery in all patients with anterior VSR. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 157±58.6 minutes and 249±78.3 minutes in survivor and non-survivor groups consecutively (p=0.018). Operative mortality within 30 days was 21%. Low output syndrome (LOS), multiple organ failure (MOF), septicemia, tracheostomy and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay were the major factor for survivals. Surgical repair of post-infarction VSR carries a high operative mortality. But, stable hemodynamic at the time of VSR diagnosis is a significant predictor of survival and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves early survival.

Ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: Incidence, treatment, and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries 1999-2014.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to assess whether the incidence and outcomes of VSR-AMI have changed in the era of timely primary PCI. BACKGROUND: Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but frequently fatal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries from 1999 to 2014 to examine trends in the incidence, surgical and percutaneous repair, and 30-day and 1-year mortality of VSR-AMI. RESULTS: The annual incidence of VSR-AMI hospitalization declined by 41.6% from 197 patients per 100,000 AMIs in 1999 to 115 patients per 100,000 AMIs in 2014 (P < 0.001). The 30-day VSR-AMI repair rate decreased from 49.9% in 1999 to 33.3% in 2014 (P < 0.001). In 2014, 82.9% of repairs were performed surgically and 17.1% percutaneously. VSR-AMI mortality rates were high (60.2% at 30 days; 68.5% at 1 year) and changed minimally over the study period with adjusted 30-day mortality per year Odds Ratio (OR) 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.01) and adjusted 1-year mortality per year OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-1.00). Across the 16 years of data, unadjusted mortality rates were lower in patients undergoing repair than in unrepaired patients at 30 days (mean 51.7% and 65.7%, P ≤ 0.01) and 1 year (mean 62.0% and 72.8%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of increased timely primary PCI, the incidence of VSR-AMI hospitalization declined but its associated mortality rate remained high. Rates of VSR repair decreased from 1999 to 2014 despite increased use of percutaneous repair.

Management and Outcome of Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: What Is New in the Era of Percutaneous Intervention?

BACKGROUND: Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture (PI-VSR) is a rare but devastating complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Risk stratification in the acute phase is crucial for decision-making, and this study analyzed the risk factors for early mortality and the effects of various management options on the outcome of PI-VSR patients in the era of percutaneous intervention. METHODS: A total of 96 patients with PI-VSR were identified and divided into an acute-phase survivor group (n = 46, survived ≥2 weeks after admission) and a nonsurvivor group (n = 50, died within 2 weeks after admission). Percutaneous closure was considered in acute-phase survivors. Patients were followed up for a mean 47 (quartiles 15-71) months by clinical visit or telephone interview. RESULTS: The overall acute-phase (i.e., < 2 weeks after the diagnosis of PI-VSR) mortality rate was 52%. Female sex and Killip Class III-IV at admission were associated with an increased risk of acute-phase death. Of the 46 patients who survived ≥2 weeks, 20 underwent interventional occlusion and the procedure was successful in 19. Percutaneous closure in the acute-phase survivor group improved the immediate (21% in-hospital mortality rate) and long-term (53% mortality) outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PI-VSR are at a high risk of acute-phase mortality. Female sex and severe cardiac dysfunction at admission are linked with a high rate of acute-phase deaths. Percutaneous closure in acute-phase survivors results in favorable short- and long-term benefits for PI-VSR patients.

Techniques, Timing & Prognosis of Post Infarct Ventricular Septal Repair: a Re-look at Old Dogmas.

OBJECTIVE:: The study aimed to identify the factors affecting the prognosis of post myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal rupture (VSR) and to develop a protocol for its management. METHODS:: This was a single center, retrospective-prospective study (2009-2014), involving 55 patients with post MI VSR. The strengths of association between risk factors and prognosis were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The UNM Post MI VSR management and prognosis scoring systems (UPMS & UPPS) were developed. RESULTS:: Thirty-day mortality was 52.5% (35% in the last 3 years). Twenty-eight (70%) patients underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Residual ventricular septal defect was found in 3 (7.5%) patients. The multivariate analysis showed low mean blood pressure with intra-aortic balloon pump (OR 11.43, P=0.001), higher EuroSCORE II (OR 7.47, P=0.006), higher Killip class (OR 27.95, P=0.00), and shorter intervals between MI and VSR (OR 7.90, P=0.005) as well as VSR and Surgery (OR 5.76, P=0.016) to be strong predictors of mortality. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (P=0.17) and location (P=0.25) of VSR did not affect the outcome. Mean follow-up was 635.8±472.5 days and 17 out of 19 discharged patients were in NYHA class I-II. CONCLUSION:: The UNM Post-MI VSR Scoring Systems (UPMS & UPPS) help in management and prognosis, respectively. They divide patients into 3 groups: 1) Immediate Surgery - Patients with scores of <25 require immediate surgery, preferably with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and have poor prognosis; 2) Those with scores of 25-75 should be managed with "Optimal Delay" and they have intermediate outcomes; 3) Patients with scores of >75 can undergo Elective Repair and they are likely to have good outcomes.

The In Vivo Morphology of Post-Infarct Ventricular Septal Defect and the Implications for Closure.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to define the dynamic in vivo morphology of post-infarct ventricular septal defect (PIVSD), which has not been previously described in living patients. BACKGROUND: PIVSD is a devastating complication of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: The anatomic features of PIVSD, as demonstrated by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Thirty-two PIVSDs were assessed, 16 left coronary artery and 16 right coronary artery PIVSDs. PIVSDs were large (mean maximum dimension 26.5 ± 11.5 mm, mean area 5.2 ± 4.2 cm2) and oval (mean eccentricity index 1.7 ± 0.5), with thin margins (diastolic mean thickness 5 mm from the edge of the PIVSD 6.4 ± 3.0mm), and only 22% of PIVSDs were entirely confined to the septum. The defects could be larger in diastole or systole. The stem of the largest available Amplatzer occluder stem (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota) filled only 50% of defects. Patients with small defects may survive without closure. Without closure, those with large defects die. If accepted for closure, PIVSD size and coronary territory did not predict survival >1 year (overall 60%). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first detailed anatomic description of PIVSD in living patients. Defects may be larger in systole or diastole, meaning that single-phase measurement is unsuitable. Its complex nature means that the most commonly available occluder device is frequently unsuitable. Successful closure leads to prolonged survival and should be attempted where possible. This study may lead to improved patient selection, closure techniques, and device design.

Techniques, timing & prognosis of post infarct ventricular septal repair: a re-look at old dogmas

Abstract Objective: The study aimed to identify the factors affecting the prognosis of post myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal rupture (VSR) and to develop a protocol for its management. Methods: This was a single center, retrospective-prospective study (2009-2014), involving 55 patients with post MI VSR. The strengths of association between risk factors and prognosis were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. The UNM Post MI VSR management and prognosis scoring systems (UPMS & UPPS) were developed. Results: Thirty-day mortality was 52.5% (35% in the last 3 years). Twenty-eight (70%) patients underwent concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Residual ventricular septal defect was found in 3 (7.5%) patients. The multivariate analysis showed low mean blood pressure with intra-aortic balloon pump (OR 11.43, P=0.001), higher EuroSCORE II (OR 7.47, P=0.006), higher Killip class (OR 27.95, P=0.00), and shorter intervals between MI and VSR (OR 7.90, P=0.005) as well as VSR and Surgery (OR 5.76, P=0.016) to be strong predictors of mortality. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (P=0.17) and location (P=0.25) of VSR did not affect the outcome. Mean follow-up was 635.8±472.5 days and 17 out of 19 discharged patients were in NYHA class I-II. Conclusion: The UNM Post-MI VSR Scoring Systems (UPMS & UPPS) help in management and prognosis, respectively. They divide patients into 3 groups: 1) Immediate Surgery - Patients with scores of <25 require immediate surgery, preferably with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and have poor prognosis; 2) Those with scores of 25-75 should be managed with "Optimal Delay" and they have intermediate outcomes; 3) Patients with scores of >75 can undergo Elective Repair and they are likely to have good outcomes.

Interventional post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect closure: a systematic review of current evidence.

AIMS: Interventional closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defects (VSD) is an alternative treatment option to surgical repair. However, only limited evidence exists concerning the interventional closure of a VSD. This review seeks to establish an overview of the existing literature and to carry out a systematic analysis of the success rate and clinical outcome of this procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature search to evaluate the existing evidence of percutaneous device closure of post-infarction VSD. Patient series with fewer than five reported cases were excluded. In total, 13 series were identified, with an overall inclusion of 273 patients. Mean patient age was 70 years. Cardiogenic shock was present in 48% of cases at the time of intervention. Device closure within the first 14 days (acute phase) after VSD detection was performed in 42% of cases. Technical success rate was high (>75%). Successful device implantation rate was 89%. Overall in-hospital/30-day mortality was 32%. Major complications included device embolisation, ventricular perfora-tion and arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous device closure of post-myocardial infarction VSD is a valuable alternative to surgical repair, with the advantage of immediate shunt reduction to prevent haemodynamic deterioration. A high rate of technically successful percutaneous procedures can be achieved; however, the mortality rate remains high, especially in cardiogenic shock patients.

Early Mortality and Long-term Survival after Repair of Post-infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture: An Institutional Report of Experience.

BACKGROUND: To determine predictors of mortality after surgical management of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture repair. METHODS: A total of 63 patients (73.2%, mean age 67.22±7.71 years, male:female ratio; 35:28) underwent open heart surgery for post-infarction ventricular septal rupture repair. Patient demographics, operative data and postoperative parameters were analysed to reveal predictors of early mortality and long-term survival. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 54.0% (34/63). Time from myocardial infarction to operation ≤ 14 days (OR: 4.10, 95% CI 1.16-14.46, p=0.02), systolic pulmonary artery pressure > 45 mmHg (OR: 4.14, 95% CI 1.110-15.496, p=0.03) and age (years) (OR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.002-1.194, p=0.04) were found to be independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, presence of pulmonary oedema on admission (HR: 4.95, 95% CI 1.58-15.54, p=0.006), age (years) (HR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.009-1.180, p= 0.02) and cross-clamp time <60 min (HR: 3.93, 95% CI 1.13-13.64, p=0.03) were found to be independent predictors of long-term survival. Within a follow-up of a median of 60.0 months, five-year survival rate was 67±9.0%. CONCLUSION: In line with the previous studies, our study demonstrated the benefits of delaying the repair for post-infarction ventricular septal rupture to allow adequate myocardial healing if haemodynamic status of the patient allows.

Transcatheter closure of postmyocardial infarction, iatrogenic, and postoperative ventricular septal defects: The Mayo Clinic experience.

OBJECTIVES: To determine event-free survival after transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect (VSD), and to identify predictors of adverse events (AE) in post myocardial infarction VSD (post-MI VSD) subgroup. BACKGROUND: There are limited data on mid-term follow-up after transcatheter VSD closure. METHODS: Retrospective review of 27 cases of transcatheter VSD closure (post-MI = 18 and non-ischemic = 9) performed from 1999 to 2013. We defined AE as death, device embolization, hemolysis requiring blood transfusion, heart block and reintervention. RESULTS: In the post-MI VSD subgroup, mean age and follow-up was 69 ± 11 and 7.3 ± 7 years, respectively. AE occurred in 8 (44%) patients (death-3, device embolization-1, hemolysis-1, surgical VSD closure-2, reintervention-1). Event-free survival was 56% at 1 month and 5 years, and all AE occurred in the periprocedural period. Cardiogenic shock (HR: 3.21, CI: 1.82-5.41, P = 0.002), and VSD closure in acute phase (HR: 2.14, CI: 1.12-4.31, P = 0.004) were independent predictors of AE. In the non-ischemic VSD subgroup, mean age and follow-up was 49 ± 15 and 8.7 ± 8 years, respectively. AE occurred in 3 (33%) patients (late death-1, surgical VSD closure-2). For the entire cohort, freedom from death was 89% and 85% at 1 month and 5 years, and event-free survival was 70% and 61% at 1 month and 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter closure of post-MI VSD carries a moderate risk of periprocedural complications but low event rates afterwards. By comparison, device closure of non-ischemic VSD has lower periprocedural morbidity but some patients continued to experience AE during follow-up.